G'day Thomas, * Thomas Stivers <stivers_t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [031023 14:55]: > On some of the lists I am on mutt says that pgp signatures could not be > verified, but the output from gpg looks as if the signature has been > verified. I've found this too. > I think this may have something to do with the way some lists > add a mime part with the standard list blurb in it. Attached is an > example from the gnupg-users list. This isn't really problematic, but > the behavior seems unusual. Thanks. As a side issue, YOUR signature failed to verify on this message that was sent _apparently_ from you... (Well, if we are going to sign things we should take a failed sig seriously... ;-) ) S. -- European Citizens: Please do a little work to convince the European Parliament to reject software patents. This page explains the issue and provides suggestions for action; take the time to participate. http://swpat.ffii.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature