<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: mutt claiming that gpg signatures aren't verified



G'day Christoph,

* Christoph Berg <cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [031023 15:01]:

> I suspect something is wrong with your gpg setup. Have you tried a
> recent mutt version with unmodified gpg integration? (i.e. the gpg.rc
> from the mutt source)

That is not (necessarily) the problem.  My gpg set up seems(?) to
work, and yet I see the same problems with some messages failing the
test for mutt, but passing for GnuPG.

It _seems_ to be related to the MailMan list software.  However I
wouldn't put money on it.


S.

-- 
European Citizens: Please do a little work to convince the European
Parliament to reject software patents. This page explains the issue
and provides suggestions for action; take the time to participate.
  http://swpat.ffii.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature