<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: mutt claiming that gpg signatures aren't verified



Re: mutt claiming that gpg signatures aren't verified [Thomas Stivers 
<stivers_t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:54:04AM -0500, 
<20031023135404.GA6388@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> On some of the lists I am on mutt says that pgp signatures could not be
> verified, but the output from gpg looks as if the signature has been
> verified. I think this may have something to do with the way some lists
> add a mime part with the standard list blurb in it. Attached is an
> example from the gnupg-users list. This isn't really problematic, but
> the behavior seems unusual. Thanks.

My mutt/gpg verifies your attached mail as correct, but your own
signature is wrong.

I suspect something is wrong with your gpg setup. Have you tried a
recent mutt version with unmodified gpg integration? (i.e. the gpg.rc
from the mutt source)

Christoph
-- 
Christoph Berg <cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, http://www.df7cb.de/
Wohnheim D, 2405, Universität des Saarlandes, 0681/9657944

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature