Re: Timeouts?
=- Brendan Cully wrote on Wed 10.Sep'08 at 12:37:07 -0700 -=
> Yep, I missed this case. This fix looks good to me. Thanks Rocco and
> Kyle.
>
> On Wednesday, 10 September 2008 at 17:54, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> > diff -r 17adea9cdff6 -r a2ddd8bae12a keymap.c
> > --- a/keymap.c Mon Sep 01 18:23:35 2008 +0200
> > + if (ImapKeepalive >= i)
> > + imap_keepalive ();
> > + else
> > + while (ImapKeepalive && ImapKeepalive < i)
Doesn't this mean now that imap_keepalive is called every timeout?
Not that it would hurt normally, but not quite the intention, is it?
If you have low Timeout and big ImapKeepAlive, it would be called
very often, maybe too much for slow lines?
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.