Re: [Mutt] #3067: PGP/MIME signatures incorrectly assigned
#3067: PGP/MIME signatures incorrectly assigned "Content-Disposition: inline"
Comment (by jmcclelland):
> The notion that the PGP/MIME signature is "supposed to be an
> attachment", and that that somehow influences the choice of value
> for Content-Disposition is bogus:
That makes a lot of sense. Thanks for the explanation. Given the lack of
clarity in the spec, what do you think of leaving the Content-Disposition
header out entirely?
> A config-controlled option for this would be ridiculous, sorry.
I don't understand why that would be ridiculous. Can you explain or point
me
to documentation that might help me understand that? Thanks.
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3067#comment:6>