Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6?

[Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 01:00:46AM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> * On 2007.02.22, in <20070222173033.GD2755@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> *     "Brendan Cully" <brendan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 1.5.15. So, I'd like to hear once again which patches everyone would
> > like to see in 1.6 (and which patches people object to).
> 
> I have a new one recently that I never posted:
> 
> http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/sw/mutt/patch-1.5.13.dgc.nested_if.1

FWIW, I like this patch.

I long ago posted a patch for configurable flags.  It let me write
%/!*/, which would expand to ! if flagged, or else * if tagged, or
else a blank space (in that order).

I was able to produce the same effect with %<>.  It took a small
additional patch, to add %! and %*.  With that, I'm now happily using:

set hdr_format="%4C %<!?!&%<*?*& >>%.2Z%T %{%m/%d} %-15.15F (%4c) %s"

If the nested_if patch is accepted, I'll write documentation for my
two flags and post them.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery