Re: Implementation of virtual folders in mutt
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 10:32:33AM -0700, Charles Killian wrote:
> My preference for virtual folders thus far has been to use the "limit"
> suggestion.
>
> That is -- I store a bunch of mail in one mailbox (the INBOX). I then
> flag some messages using "F".
I haven't personally used the virtual mailbox concept much, but I think
the big problem with this approach is that it doesn't allow you to
create virtual folders comprised of messages from different folders,
which somewhat limits its utility.
Using mairix might work; the big limitation of that is that the
"virtual" folders take up actual space.
w