Re: Implementation of virtual folders in mutt

To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Implementation of virtual folders in mutt
From: Michael Tatge <Michael.Tatge@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:44:17 +0200
In-reply-to: <20060809195317.GA25891@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?Subject="Unsubscribe Mutt Dev"?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
References: <20060809172214.GR21816@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060809173233.GK2976@chiplaptop> <20060809195317.GA25891@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14

* On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 William Yardley (mutt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) muttered:
> Using mairix might work; the big limitation of that is that the
> "virtual" folders take up actual space.

For maildir mairix does exactly what the OP describes. Just make
symlinks. Only mbox messages are copied over.

HTH,

Michael
-- 
NEVER RESPOND TO CRITICAL PRESS.  IT IS A GAME YOU CAN ONLY LOSE, AND IT
MAKES US LOOK BAD.
                -- Bruce Perens

PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC1A44DD
Jabber:     init[0]@amessage.de

References:
- Implementation of virtual folders in mutt
  - From: Chris
- Re: Implementation of virtual folders in mutt
  - From: Charles Killian
- Re: Implementation of virtual folders in mutt
  - From: William Yardley

Prev by Date: Re: The future of mailboxes?
Next by Date: Re: The future of mailboxes?
Previous by thread: Re: Implementation of virtual folders in mutt
Next by thread: Re: Implementation of virtual folders in mutt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread