On Friday, 19 May 2006 at 09:53, Rocco Rutte wrote: > * Brendan Cully [06-05-18 12:36:19 -0700] wrote: > > >I don't think it's necessary to include release notices that > >don't include features either. > > My main idea is to help people going with the devel series as for the > stable series, there are/will be separate documents already. So there > won't be such a release without feature changes... :) I trimmed the non-existent ones anyway. Presumably we just haven't read the changelog for the versions between 1.5.5 and 1.5.11 :) > But I still wonder if we can append the date like so: > > Mutt 1.5.11 (2005-09-15): > > M $envelope_from is now a deprecated alias for > $use_envelope_from (2005-09-14) > > ...because if doesn't really destroy the compactness and this document > is supposed to help in the future and not for past releases. I've committed your patch, but only kept the feature dates for CVS. I don't think they're very useful once an official release contains them.
Attachment:
pgp01CGEWiey7.pgp
Description: PGP signature