On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 04:40:19PM +0100, Rado S wrote: > Why not have MFT override recipients completely for list-reply, > to have _all_ and _only_ those in MFT? My current understanding - and please correct me when it's wrong: * group-reply will reply to all, MFT entries and lists * list-reply will reply to known lists, as well as putting MFT in copy * reply will reply to just MFT That would seem to cover all bases. If we make the change you're suggesting, don't we lose an option - replying to just lists and MFT people? -- Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature