Re: wish: list-reply replies to too many (should only to MFT)
[=- Thomas Roessler wrote on Wed 16.Nov'05 at 16:27:35 +0100 -=]
> On 2005-11-16 16:24:35 +0100, Rado S wrote:
>
> > When working with lists I want to use list-reply, not group-reply
> > just to bypass MFT/list-reply deficiency (from my perspective, of
> > course ;).
>
> The intent of the code is that, normally, group-reply is the
> right function to use if you want to reply to everyone concerned
> by a message.
>
> The idea behind list-reply is that you're able to sepcifically
> fish for all known mailing lists. Hence the difference in
> behavior.
This is clear when only by itself.
The trouble comes when MFT joins the game.
Excuse me if MFT's role is not so trivial for me.
Why not have MFT override recipients completely for list-reply,
to have _all_ and _only_ those in MFT?
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
Even if it seems insignificant, in fact EVERY effort counts
for a shared task, at least to show your deserving attitude.