On Sunday, 11 September 2005 at 21:34, TAKAHASHI Tamotsu wrote: > On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Brendan Cully wrote: > > On Thursday, 11 August 2005 at 03:10, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > Perhaps html2text[*] from Martin Bayer, with a good html2textrc file? > > > > > > * http://www.mbayer.de/html2text/ > > > > It supports less HTML than w3m, lynx, and links. It doesn't do a very > > good job with the manual produced by the docbook xsl I'm using. links, > > btw, doesn't produce output as good as w3m's, and doesn't do > > bold/underline anyway. > > I don't think it is so bad. It is the only one program > natively supports bold/underline, isn't it? Lynx does too, in fact. That's why it's currently the default renderer in the Makefile. > w3m is good if bold/underline is implemented. > For example, a dirty hack: > ======================= > sed 's,<strong>,MsS,;s,</strong>,MsE,;s,<em>,MiS,;s,</em>,MiE,' \ > manual.html | \ > w3m -T text/html -O latin-1 -S -no-graph -dump | \ > ruby strong-em.rb As much as I like the language, I'm not inclined to add ruby to the dependency list. On the other hand, docbook does drag in a pretty motley crew all by itself... this script of yours could probably be done in awk, or certainly perl. Might not be a bad idea...
Attachment:
pgpIDf2sMpNhn.pgp
Description: PGP signature