Re: mutt/624: "fcc-hook . +%F" and "save-hook . +%F" behave different: fcc pre-pends "To "

To: Mutt Developers <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>, Alain Bench <veronatif@xxxxxxx>, Gregor Zattler <texmex@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: mutt/624: "fcc-hook . +%F" and "save-hook . +%F" behave different: fcc pre-pends "To "
From: Alain Bench <veronatif@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:59:22 +0200
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <mutt-pr-624@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx

Synopsis: "fcc-hook  . +%F"   and   "save-hook . +%F" behave different: fcc 
pre-pends "To "

**** Comment added by ab on Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:59:22 +0200 ****
 Despam and devirus "unformatted:" text, and tag wishlist.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: mutt/624: "fcc-hook . +%F" and "save-hook . +%F" behave different: fcc pre-pends "To "
  - From: Gregor Zattler

Prev by Date: Bug submission
Next by Date: Re: mutt/1547: send-hook does not work with edit_headers
Previous by thread: Re: Bug submission
Next by thread: Re: mutt/624: "fcc-hook . +%F" and "save-hook . +%F" behave different: fcc pre-pends "To "
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread