On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 05:04:12PM +0200, Alain Bench wrote: > I believe each case makes sense. And let's not forget $sort_re > finetunes cases 1 and 3. Hum... Quadoptions ask-yes-no are not suitable, > probably a separate bolean is more. As name, well, why not something > totally cryptic and illogical as $new_subject_breaks_threads (this name > comes from Slrn)? Rather than trying to force things into a boolean, why not create a "threads" setting, which encompasses what you want plus strict_threads? Saves the confusion of trying to work out which takes priority, strict_threads or your variable (which is long to type ;). threads=subject threads=references threads=none threads=all ? -- Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature