On Saturday, 30 July 2005 at 00:52, Paul Walker wrote: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:35:01AM +0200, Alain Bench wrote: > > > After all a changing title in thread can be a hijacking new mail, an > > artifact, or just a topic that evolved. IMHO this wish makes sense. > > Possibly I'm missing something here, but isn't this what "strict_threads" is > for? $strict_threads is almost the opposite. Without $strict_threads, mutt will glue messages together even if they have no common message IDs in their References or In-Reply-To headers, just because they have the same subject. But even with $strict_threads set, mutt will glue together messages with _different_ subjects if they _do_ have any common ref or IRT headers. This request is that there should be a way to automatically break threads if the subject changes. Kind of a $fragile_threads option. or strict_threads could go from boolean to some tristate option. I don't really have any use for it myself though, now that the edit-threads patch has been applied.
Attachment:
pgp1EYE898AaC.pgp
Description: PGP signature