<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: mutt development status



On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:55:28AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> BTSes: what's the deal? Can we not agree on a suitable system?
>
not to repeat everything:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-announce&m=110496783213964&w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-dev&m=110674212511553&w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-dev&m=110683709010539&w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-dev&m=110691668404550&w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-dev&m=110833934627650&w=2
(this is sort of all the same thread, just more or less broken)

oh, and there was this thread set off by another rant of mine: :)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-dev&m=104267151200485&w=2

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.