Re: mutt development status

To: Mutt Developers <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: mutt development status
From: "Andriy N. Gritsenko" <andrej@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:53:17 +0300
In-reply-to: <20050711184745.GJ23202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <20050711140610.GA9135@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050711152154.GG29879@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050711160848.GC13233@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050711162148.GA21826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050711180515.GA7619@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050711184745.GJ23202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

    Hi, Paul Walker!

Sometime (on Monday, July 11 at 21:48) I've received something...

>> What about NNTP?

>Discussed, with viewpoints on both sides. Since nobody could agree on it
>going in or staying out, I would guess that's why it stayed out.

    Only reason that I've ever seen against of including (optional!) NNTP
support into Mutt was "Mutt is mail reading program, not news" and it was
from Thomas Roessler years ago. I hope it's changed now. :)  If not, then
would you like to discuss it and find common solution for that?

    With best wishes.
    Andriy.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: mutt development status
  - From: Moritz Barsnick

References:
- mutt development status
  - From: Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: mutt development status
  - From: Hendrik Mangels
- Re: mutt development status
  - From: Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: mutt development status
  - From: Paul Walker
- Re: mutt development status
  - From: John J. Foster
- Re: mutt development status
  - From: Paul Walker

Prev by Date: Re: tag-prefix-cond, cond-end problem?
Next by Date: Re: mutt development status
Previous by thread: Re: mutt development status
Next by thread: Re: mutt development status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread