<<< Date Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: What should go into 1.5.7?

To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
From: Thomas Glanzmann <sithglan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:09:58 +0100
In-reply-to: <20050207164359.GB17542@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
References: <20050126115002.GH4589@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050127175406.GA4715@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050207161741.GA17542@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050207162828.GG7212@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050207164359.GB17542@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.7i

Hello,

> Not IMAP though ?

nope.

        Thomas

References:
- What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: Thomas Roessler
- Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: John J. Foster
- Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: John J. Foster
- Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: Thomas Glanzmann
- Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: John J. Foster

Prev by Date: Re: xterm title (What should go into 1.5.7?)
Next by Date: Bug#294132: mutt: maildir mtime patch is inefficient
Previous by thread: Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
Next by thread: Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread