Re: short assumed (was: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?))
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 08:43:49AM +0900, Tamotsu Takahashi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 10:43:48PM +0100, Alain Bench wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 11:41:27 PM +0900, Tamotsu Takahashi
> > wrote:
> > > Why does it prevent mutt_convert_string() from masking unconvertible
> > > chars? Or it doesn't?
> >
> > I suppose not.
You are right. With a good font, I can see U+FFFD.
No problem here.
So, I would like you to explain your problem again.
You said, ``Still have to study masking on UTF-8:
Seems to be a "?" or U+FFFD masking char minor inconsistency.''
Apparently I misunderstood you.
Could you give me an example?
I see U+FFFD in both index mode and pager mode.
--
tamo