On Wednesday, 05 January 2005 at 23:37, Paul Walker wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:11:03PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: > > > It is not clear to me what the best way forward for managing mutt > > bugs would be. Obviously, the e-mail based approach we have been > > using so far is not an option at this point. > > I'm afraid I can't offer any hosting; however, would creating a SourceForge > project to use their feature and bug tracking systems be a viable way > forwards? This exists now, but we should probably experiment with it a bit before committing to it. One drawback (?) is that it doesn't allow email submission. Also, we'll have to see how easy it is to import the current BTS into sourceforge's.
Attachment:
pgpEZGoHrMVbh.pgp
Description: PGP signature