Re: [patch] Re: Reply-To header problem
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 01:20:31PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: To mutt in <20040119101709.GB1701@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > More verbose, reverse_name and friends work only if the message is "To:"
> > you (or "Cc:"). Mutt can't look at every header that your MTA could use
> > to indicate which address message went to (Delivered-To, grepping
> > Received... - the former seems to be used by qmail, postfix and/or
> > mailman).
Why can't it look at Delivered-To, if that is semi-standard? It
would make mutt act more intuitively for many users. Would a patch
to recognize Delivered-To (and perhaps others) if there is no match
in To or Cc be accepted?
Andrew