<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [patch] Re: Reply-To header problem



Re: Andrew Pimlott in <20040121132656.GS21327@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > More verbose, reverse_name and friends work only if the message is "To:"
> > > you (or "Cc:"). Mutt can't look at every header that your MTA could use
> > > to indicate which address message went to (Delivered-To, grepping
> > > Received... - the former seems to be used by qmail, postfix and/or
> > > mailman).
> 
> Why can't it look at Delivered-To, if that is semi-standard?  It
> would make mutt act more intuitively for many users.  Would a patch
> to recognize Delivered-To (and perhaps others) if there is no match
> in To or Cc be accepted?

To properly serve it's purpose, $alternates must only look at To and Cc
to recognize mail directed to you. If it would recognize every mail you
get, it would be useless.

It might be good in the context of $reverse_name to look at other
headers, but that would probably require many changes to the mutt code.

Just use send-hooks to set your From: address for mailing lists, this
works.

Christoph
-- 
Christoph Berg <cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, http://www.df7cb.de/
Wohnheim D, 2405, Universität des Saarlandes, 0681/9657944

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature