On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:40:16PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 06:20:59PM -0500, Allister MacLeod wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:51:13AM -0500, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 09:38:42AM -0500, Allister MacLeod wrote: > > > > > * - or correspond with people whose realnames are sometimes mis-set by > > > > braindead mail software, maybe > > > > Well, how about if addresses you have aliased are automatically recognized > > > and sorted by the name _you_ assigned them instead of what the stupid > > > mailer put? > > > Ooo.. good feature! It might take a bit of extra infrastructure to > > make it work, but it'd probably be well worth it. > > Well $reverse_alias does something similar (though currently, > $reverse_alias only affects display, not sorting). I wonder if somebody familiar with the relevent code can give an estimate on time required to make a patch for this. . . - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpEWqqN5EmHN.pgp
Description: PGP signature