On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 09:38:42AM -0500, Allister MacLeod wrote: > Good point. As far as "ultimate correctness" I think your solution is > indeed best (and identical to what mutt currently does, right?) > Still, some people--e.g. Will, and, on occasion, myself--will want to > use fanciful "realnames"* but still keep things sorted by address. In > that case, I'd suggest a configure-time toggle as the best solution. > > * - or correspond with people whose realnames are sometimes mis-set by > braindead mail software, maybe Well, how about if addresses you have aliased are automatically recognized and sorted by the name _you_ assigned them instead of what the stupid mailer put? - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpqxE2NBzKaQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature