Re: mutt reply enconding problem
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 05:29:07PM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> Now, what mutt *should* do, I think, is mask those unprintable
> non-recognizable characters when it hands them to the editor, so that
> they don't confuse the editor (and to help avoid sending incorrect
> headers to other people)... you should probably submit a bug report
> (http://dev.mutt.org) so that this gets fixed.
OK I 'll submit it, I think a simple isascii() to each char of the subject
will do the trick. Meanwhile, I 'll try to write a procmail filter to fix
such issues as they are also hit on spamassassin.
Thanks,
D.
--
PGP key 39A40276 at wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net
key fingeprint: 9A0B 61C6 B826 4B73 69BB 972B C5E7 A153 39A4 0276