Re: [OT] List corrupting DomainKeys?
- To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [OT] List corrupting DomainKeys?
- From: Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:30:15 -0600
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=memoryhole.net; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns/txt; s=default; bh=oDgplX4h4o1KC4JEPuFuVBjiohc=; b=X+rvKMVepWzkYV0ue8rQQH/++XIoXWiArDhbVSNl6FdPh/MpkzVNGbWrvgS0BJEv/9G/+kTiPS62QS0Z1GHXOcqzVRx7vPaU5TUCT/KEZuul9XEvM63ZrdLGfVeBrZKNKwX1hvhX7yU7Jjpm5mnEdEaocJpRBgWt8AE6rTyj91c=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=memoryhole.net; b=ZcQsFrO6zyTF9arOZ4rUYp4PCUL7elUCzxje9KiEYJ1M1hyjZ0qZrz7FZM/TQRiMJtBvox8wmmmVJKxk2xunYNW8ymw/gtw19S1g2UrwBm15QHJfnjgFRhzmPMLi/g21Lzo+0bsIoBAVJFb1WO4f/cWqId4PpNxTTzc8UzgzN9c=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent;
- In-reply-to: <20070829170357.GC23259@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
- Mail-followup-to: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- References: <20070829165933.GI8241@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070829170357.GC23259@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-08-28)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, August 29 at 10:03 AM, quoth Brendan Cully:
>> My posts to the list are all signed with both DomainKey and DKIM
>> signatures, and for some reason, they're all broken. What is the
>> mutt mailing list software *doing* that's breaking the DKIM
>> signatures?
>
> According to my inbound DKIM validator, your message passes. Maybe
> it's only the domainkey that's failing? I believe domainkey is a
> little less robust.
Hrm, it would appear that you are correct. My DKIM validator was
broken (needed to update Mail::DKIM), so now the DKIM signatures
validate correctly. However my DomainKey signatures are still broken;
my validator says "Message is not valid syntax.", whatever that means.
Does anyone else have any clue?
~Kyle
- --
Preach the Gospel at all times and when necessary use words.
-- St. Francis of Assisi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!
iD8DBQFG1a0nBkIOoMqOI14RAhkVAKDF9V58srS1khYTafze4jA+nfOliwCg2sal
E7MTZHvqKZ2972U0HtjlX5U=
=H9PE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----