Re: [OT] List corrupting DomainKeys?
- To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [OT] List corrupting DomainKeys?
- From: Brendan Cully <brendan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:03:57 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=kublai.com; h=date:to: subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to:from; q=dns/txt; s=dk; bh=7YnITmubES8exxvHyZg+Gxc8vx Q=; b=cSyKYE/rWHZFwjdGQuj58kO4QSDpLTq3NOjPQC/dkjf431ymTSmgJpNB8a 7QthG9gPW/z3s138l0BSqThxzUY+oDVL/lzmy3v4jnTeUCWDB9LXQsYwM+L7zdJS f/QjG6/DTxzK0xxMUIBtKReBpqbU5bbdx3Sms3EO+CbZ9feTY=
- In-reply-to: <20070829165933.GI8241@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
- References: <20070829165933.GI8241@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-07-25)
On Wednesday, 29 August 2007 at 10:59, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I swear this has been talked about before, but I can't find it in the
> list archive...
>
> My posts to the list are all signed with both DomainKey and DKIM
> signatures, and for some reason, they're all broken. What is the mutt
> mailing list software *doing* that's breaking the DKIM signatures?
>
> Should it perhaps be stripping DomainKey/DKIM signatures out of list
> messages?
According to my inbound DKIM validator, your message passes. Maybe
it's only the domainkey that's failing? I believe domainkey is a
little less robust.