Re: Mutt or muttng?

To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Mutt or muttng?
From: Eyolf Oestrem <eyolf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:22:20 +0200
In-reply-to: <0ML2xA-1I3ePx0xLN-0003qn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
Mail-followup-to: Eyolf Oestrem <eyolf@xxxxxxxxxxx>, mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
References: <20070627202239.GA20244@eyo> <0ML2xA-1I3ePx0xLN-0003qn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13cvs-muttng (2007-01-09)

On 27.06.2007 (22:43), Alexander Dahl wrote:
>> So far, I've been using mutt-ng, but today I figured I would try out vanilla
>> mutt -- for no particular reason, other than to try out the newest
>> relase.
>
>You seem to use mutt 1.5.15 but 1.5.16 is newest release. 8-)

You're right; I do want that sidebar from time to time, so I went for
the latest version with the sidebar patch, which is 1.5.15.

e
-- 
Debian is the Jedi operating system: "Always two there are, a master and
an apprentice".
                -- Simon Richter on debian-devel

References:
- Mutt or muttng?
  - From: Eyolf Oestrem

Prev by Date: Re: Mutt or muttng?
Next by Date: Mime-Problem
Previous by thread: Re: Mutt or muttng?
Next by thread: Mime-Problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread