Re: autoencrypt
Yes, much thanks for the patch. Any chance this will end up in the Debian
package at some point, or am I going to have to keep building mutt?
Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > * James <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2006-04-01 22:57 -0500]:
> >> When I set pgp_autoencrypt, mutt tries to encrypt messages to
> >> recipients for whom I don't have keys. Is there a function that tells
> >> mutt "encrypt for this person if a key is available but otherwise send
> >> cleartext"?
> >
> > AFAIK not in plain mutt. Some people create send-hooks from there
> > key-listings. I wrote a patch to achieve this, but until now I have
> > the impression that no one was interessted in it (nobody ever said
> > anything about it; it's on my homepage, but I'm too lazy to look
> > into the logs).
>
> Well I like it. I can't remember when I first got it, but it was
> named patch-1.5.6.nr.crypt-autohook-ALPHA at the time. I only
> recently went from 1.5.6 to 1.5.11 and in doing so I poked around and
> found that you'd updated the patch. I have it applied here still and
> find it useful. I was formerly using some simplistic scripts to
> automate this to the extent that I could.
>
> So, here's an overdue thanks Nicolas. +1 for making one less step I
> have to take to send more encrypted mail. :)
>
> --
> Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xD654075A | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
> ======================================================================
> Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.
>
--
GPG Fingerprint: E8B0 8163 C9DF 6C91 4567 895C 090F 1B45 87ED 9963