<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: hierarchical folder in mutt?



* On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 Jun Sun (jsun@xxxxxxxxxx) muttered:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 03:26:37AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> > * On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 Jun Sun (jsun@xxxxxxxxxx) muttered:
> > > The problem is that all the lists show up at the top-level mail folder,
> > 
> > yes in the mailboxes view. If you want a hirachical structure use the
> > browser.
> > 
> 
> Are you sure? In browser view, you only view directories and files.
> Mutt does not tell you whether you have any new emails in any of the
> files. Right?

wrong.

 7   N     4096 Feb 02 13:44 mutt-dev/
 8   N     4096 Jan 15  2003 mutt-users/

Mutt: Directory [=mailinglists] 

> A true hierarchical mail folder *would* do the following:
> 
> 1. at top level, it would only lists "lists/" as a composite folder.
> 3. you can select "lists/", press "Enter", and you will be presented with
>    another list of all sub-folders under "lists/", each of which would
>    be attached with "N" if any of them has new emails.

That's the way it is now. Obviously you didn't even try.

> 2. it would attach "N" next to "lists" if any sub-folder under lists/ has
>    a new email.

Mutt does not do that.

HTH,

Michael
-- 
Not only Guinness - Linux is good for you, too.
        -- Banzai on IRC

PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC1A44DD
Jabber:     init[0]@amessage.de