Re: Simple test - ignore

To: Mutt Users <mutt-users@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Simple test - ignore
From: Steve Kennedy <steve-mu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 14:13:42 +0000
In-reply-to: <20041126171545.GI29349@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-users-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Mutt Users <mutt-users@xxxxxxxx>
Organisation: NetTek Ltd
References: <20041126164931.GF11898@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041126165652.GR14418@xxxxxxxxxx> <20041126171052.GS14418@xxxxxxxxxx> <20041126171545.GI29349@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

Sorry all, we had an NFS failure. This shouldn't have effected things
too badly, but only mail to gbnet itself would have been deferred.

However gbnet was the victim of a SPAM attack ("dictionary attack" type
SPAM to gbnet systems, and being used as the source address for
outgoing SPAM).

Unfortunatrly due to the sheer volume of mail that became backlogged
when the NFS server went back on-line (about 24 hours later) things took
a few days to clear.


Steve

-- 
NetTek Ltd Phone/Fax +44-(0)20 7483 2455
SMS steve-epage (at) gbnet.net [body] gpg 1024D/468952DB 2001-09-19

References:
- Simple test - ignore
  - From: Thomas Glanzmann
- Re: Simple test - ignore
  - From: Michelle Konzack
- Re: Simple test - ignore
  - From: Michelle Konzack
- Re: Simple test - ignore
  - From: Patrick Shanahan

Prev by Date: [OT] "From_" header
Next by Date: Re: address rewriting on reply
Previous by thread: Re: Simple test - ignore
Next by thread: binding more than one action to a key?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread