Re: Not displaying the "L" flag
On 2004-09-04, Rob Reid <kepler@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At 1:35 PM PDT on September 4 Gary Johnson sent off:
> > On 2004-09-04, Bill Moseley <moseley@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > For subscribed lists the "L" flag is displayed. When I have a list go
> > > to its own mailbox then I don't really need to see the "L" flag. Can
> > > its display be disabled?
> >
> > Sure. Use a couple of folder-hooks to set to_chars the way you want
> > for each folder.
>
> > folder-hook . 'set to_chars=" +TCFL"'
> > folder-hook +Lists/. 'set to_chars=" +TCF "'
>
> The only (admittedly minor) problem with that is that it still reserves a
> column for the L.
But the status flags occupy only 3 columns, and the column used by
the L is shared with the other "to" flags. So setting the L flag to
a space is not really wasting a column. If you really need that
extra column and you don't want to see any of the "to" flags, you
could either set to_chars to " " and remove the space in
index_format following the "%Z", or replace the "%Z" with "%S" in
the index_format.
HTH,
Gary
--
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
garyjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Wireless Division
http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ | Spokane, Washington, USA