On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 05:55:42PM -0400, Todd wrote: > Daniel Carrera wrote: > > Can I make Mutt default to *not* sign emails going to a particular > > email address? > > Sure. This is simple with a send-hook: > > send-hook . 'set pgp_autosign=yes' > send-hook '~t list_address' 'set pgp_autosign=no' Thanks a lot. :-D > > It can't even handle PGP. > > That's not entirely true. Outlook (or Outlook Express, I've never > tested them both enough to know which barfs on what) doesn't handle > OpenPGP/MIME. It wrongly displays the message as an attachment. Yeah. That's what the OutLEAK users were reporting. > It also does not handle the inline pgp messages created by Mutt < 1.5 > which use a content-type of application/pgp. Mutt >= 1.5 now uses > text/plain for inline messages and Outlook will display them. Yes. Outlook would have to be severely broken to not display text/plain inline messages. I take that back. Outlook *is* severely broken. > If you really want to continue signing messages to this list AND not > make all the Outlook users whine, you can use the pgp-traditional > patch from Dale Woolridge for mutt 1.4: > > http://www.woolridge.ca/mutt/pgp-traditional.html > > Or you could give the development version of mutt a try. I have the patch installed. That was my earlier solution to this problem. But I want to avoid PGP traditinal because it's deprecated. I don't like the idea of holding back progress because Microsoft couldn't be bothered to support a standard. So instead I'm switching to PGP/MIME and just not signing the emails going to Outlook users. Thanks for the help! :-) Cheers, -- Daniel Carrera | No trees were harmed in the generation of this PhD student. | e-mail. A significant number of electrons were, Math Dept. UMD | however, severely inconvenienced.
Attachment:
pgpX0ZdZOmRsa.pgp
Description: PGP signature