On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 10:04:49AM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote: > I have to say I agree 100% percent with Derek. Thanks. Finally I feel like I'm not the only one who thinks so... For a lon time (2+years) I've been advocating this change with no feedback from anyone. I was starting to think there was something wrong with /me/... [Well, that's probably still true... ;-)] > (e) ONLY encrypt the message (i.e. change the options to only > encrypt, regardless of what they currently are). > (s) ONLY sign the message, regardless of current options. > (a) change the key with which to sign, adding the sign option if > necessary > (b) do both, regardless of current options > (i) toggle in-line attachments (but change menu to indicate toggle) > (c) clear the encryption options FWIW, I have a patch on my website which provides exactly this, and applies to all previous releases of Mutt. Recent code in CVS seems to have changed the way this is handled, completely breaking my patch. If the debian version of mutt is from the 1.5.6 release, I believe there'sa version of the patch which will apply to it. If it's from CVS, it probably won't work. http://www.pizzashack.org/mutt -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank the spammers.
Attachment:
pgpBCZeJma9Ej.pgp
Description: PGP signature