Re: segmentation on reply
* On Tue, May 11, 2004 Eric Smith (es@xxxxxxxxxxxx) muttered:
> I am getting a seg fault whenever I <reply> with the following mutt.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> [eric@pepper ~] 2 $ mutt -v
> patch-1.5.6.vvv.nntp
> patch-1.5.6.dgc.xlabel_ext.6
> patch-1.5.6.dgc.isalias.1
> patch-1.5.6.dgc.setenv.1
> patch-1.5.6.dgc.softfill.2
> patch-1.5.6.dgc.flagsafe.1
> patch-1.5.6.dgc.fmtpipe.1
> patch-1.5.6.dgc.pairnumber.1
> patch-1.5.6.dgc.hormel.1
> patch-1.5.6.dgc.markmsg.2
> patch-1.5.6.dgc.deepif.1
> patch-1.5.6.dgc.groupalts.2
> patch-1.5.6.rr.compressed
> patch-1.5.6.dgc.attach.5
> patch-1.5.6.cd.pattern_broken.1
> patch-1.5.6.cd.edit_threads.9.2
> patch-1.5.6.dgc.unbind.1
> patch-1.5.6.ats.mark_old.1
> patch-1.5.6.ats.date_conditional.1
> patch-1.5.6.ats.parent_match.1
Well, these are a lot of patches. Are you getting a segfault without the
patches?
Michael
--
Don't hit the keys so hard, it hurts.
PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key