On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 05:32:46AM EST, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 2004-02-23 19:37:33 -0500, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > > AFAIK, Mutt doesn't allow you to do this directly. > > Wrong. Go to the view-attach menu (v), tag the attachments you want > to forward, and apply-forward. You may have to play with > mime_forward, mime_forward_decode, and mime_forward_rest. /me thanks God for disclaimer words like "AFAIK" :-) Anyway, I think I may be able to argue that doesn't really qualify as "direct:" the user still has to tag all the attachments of the message he's replying to - i.e., it's not automatically taken care of. I guess you can probably put together a macro for each screen in which you'd want to use such a function, but that's a fair amount of work, AFAICT. (In the clumsy workaround I posted, the entire message is kept 100% intact, and your reply allows you to modify it in any way you wish (such as to swap the From: and To: addresses) ... but you're starting out with an identical image of the original, not a blank slate to which you have to manually add anything you want to include in your message. Furthermore, if you're going the attachment-forwarding route, you'll have to manually input the address to reply to anyway (whereas starting out with the original message means you have his addy right there), so whether you gain all that much going that route seems slightly questionable.) Thanks for the info, - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpjsLLrk0tbh.pgp
Description: PGP signature