Markus, et al -- ...and then markus reichelt said... % % -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- % Hash: SHA1 % % David T-G <davidtg-muttusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: % > % I use mutt and PGP together with the .procmail headerrewrite trick from % > % the homepage www.mutt.org % > % > You shouldn't have to use that any more, BTW, and it's not entirely safe. % % I'm using this procmail rule as well and experienced no problems at all. % I've never heard of problems related to it. Anything bad happened % that we should be aware of? 1) It's been discussed in the archives. 2) It messes up any existing content-types. 3) It's been quite a while since I looked at it :-) % % I'm using mutt 1.5.3i for some time now and just had to use that procmail rule in % order to get mutt working flawlessly with GnuPG 1.2.1 Why? Does esc-P not work for you for some reason? % % OTOH, I tend to stick to working solutions :-) Yes, but working solutions known to be bad when alternative working solutions expected to not be bad are not so good. % % - -- % Bastard Administrator in $hell HTH & HAND :-D -- David T-G * There is too much animal courage in (play) davidtg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx * society and not sufficient moral courage. (work) davidtgwork@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Mary Baker Eddy, "Science and Health" http://justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
Attachment:
pgpLEwATfGkNd.pgp
Description: PGP signature