Re: Forgotten attachment checker
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 02:08:06PM +0200, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> * "Stewart V. Wright" <svwright+lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [031013 14:04]:
> > Personally I like the UNIX/mutt philosophy of having a tool do it's
> > job, and do it well. Checking on "attach" is not MUA issue IMHO.
>
> > You'd need translations, but do we allow all languages at once or just
> > the language you have for default? What about all the Germans on this
> > list that have LANG=de, but reply to us (ignorant fools) in English?
>
> We have reply_regexp (thank god), so why not attach_regexp ?
I think special command for composing mail that gets attachment first
and then offers chance for editing is much cleaner solution. And I do
think that this feature would be very useful. (Don't even want to count
how many messages I sent without attachments :)
Andrei