Re: Forgotten attachment checker

To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Forgotten attachment checker
From: Johan Almqvist <johan-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:08:06 +0200
In-reply-to: <20031013120401.GG15245@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-users-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
References: <20031013005533.34526.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031013120401.GG15245@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

* "Stewart V. Wright" <svwright+lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [031013 14:04]:
> Personally I like the UNIX/mutt philosophy of having a tool do it's
> job, and do it well.  Checking on "attach" is not MUA issue IMHO.

> You'd need translations, but do we allow all languages at once or just
> the language you have for default?  What about all the Germans on this
> list that have LANG=de, but reply to us (ignorant fools) in English?

We have reply_regexp (thank god), so why not attach_regexp ?

-Johan
-- 
Johan Almqvist
http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Forgotten attachment checker
  - From: Andrei A. Voropaev

References:
- Forgotten attachment checker
  - From: Mark Tlay
- Re: Forgotten attachment checker
  - From: Stewart V. Wright

Prev by Date: Re: Forgotten attachment checker
Next by Date: Re: Make unread the same as new
Previous by thread: Re: Forgotten attachment checker
Next by thread: Re: Forgotten attachment checker
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread