On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 02:40:20PM -0400, Bryan Bibb wrote: > When I compose a message, the signing seems to work. However, I > cannot extract any keys from messages, including my own. When I do ^K, > I get the following error: > > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found. > gpg: Total number processed: 0 > Press any key to continue... Ok, I figured out that I have the same problem described in this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/mutt-users@xxxxxxxx/msg10998.html I think... When I view my message view web interface (i.e. before it comes through our pop3 server) the attachment is listed as application/pgp-signature. By the time it gets to me, though, it is in application/octet-stream. Anyway, I installed the mutt.octet.filter script, and referenced it in my muttrc and in my mailcap. Now, instead of the octet-stream "unsupported type error" I get this at the bottom of my message: [-- Attachment #2: Attach0 --] [-- Type: application/octet-stream, Encoding: base64, Size: 0.3K --] [-- Autoview using mutt.octet.filter '/tmp/Attach0' --] [-- mutt.octet.filter file type: "PGP armored text" --] [-- Statistics (lines words chars): 7 13 196 /tmp/Attach0 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----^M Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)^M ^M iD8DBQE/ha+vZHkU/XQom+8RAm3oAKCakPzJtJMqpu1vQka6h7b0UlcCNgCglhRc^M Or6kl8xA9pu9CPUcwAxhem4=^M =XZVK^M -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----^M Running ^K on this message returns the same error as before. I'm thinking now that octet.filter isn't enough to make the signature available for GPG verification? Bryan
Attachment:
pgpTpOFJIvsmj.pgp
Description: PGP signature