Re: multipart/alternative question
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:16:57PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> But anyway, I don't consider this message to have ANY "attachments".
> The person didn't send me any extra files to look at. They sent me the
> same message twice, one with extra formatting and one without. I don't
> think most people would consider that to be a message with
> "attachments", so I don't think mutt should say that there is an
> attachment.
Well, I would consider such a message as attachment only: No message
(i. e. no body), only three attachments.