Re: How to let mutt always mark mbox as new if it contains new
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 12:13:54AM -0400, Chris Jones wrote:
>
> I totally disagree.
>
> I think mutt's logic makes excellent sense .. Especially in this list, I
> routinely get mail that I couldn't care less about .. from regular
> posters I know are past redemption..
>
> I don't see why I should go to the trouble of having to delete their
> contributions.
>
> I don't have much time, so I ignore them.
>
> I feel mutt's logic is 100% correct.. telling me there are _new_ posts
> on top of stuff I intially couldn't be bothered to delete and not take
> into account whatever garbage I didn't have the time & patience to get
> rid of.
>
> Nothing personal, I assure you.
Then an option should be made to fit different user's taste I think, because
from your view, 'mark_old' no need to be exist too.
--
Hi,
Wu, Yue