Re: How to let mutt always mark mbox as new if it contains new
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 12:13:54AM -0400, Chris Jones wrote:
>
> I think mutt's logic makes excellent sense .. Especially in this list, I
> routinely get mail that I couldn't care less about .. from regular
> posters I know are past redemption..
>
> I don't see why I should go to the trouble of having to delete their
> contributions.
>
> I don't have much time, so I ignore them.
>
> I feel mutt's logic is 100% correct.. telling me there are _new_ posts
> on top of stuff I intially couldn't be bothered to delete and not take
> into account whatever garbage I didn't have the time & patience to get
> rid of.
Say, I have many mailboxes that have many new messages, but now I have no so
much time to see all of them, so I quickly enter mailboxes one by one, then
just pick the message I'm got most of interested, leave the remaining messges
for viewing them when I have time. Serveral hours later, I have time, I want
to see the new messages that I haven't seen last time, but now, all mailboxes
haven't any flags, so I have to go through all of them to see if there are new
message in them or not.
--
Hi,
Wu, Yue