<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: <shift><tab> bind doesn't work even though it's listed with ?



On (02:30 14/12/08), Dave Wood <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> put forth the proposition:
> On (10:22 14/12/08), bill lam <cbill.lam@xxxxxxxxx> put forth the proposition:
> > On Sat, 13 Dec 2008, Dave Wood wrote:
> > > I'm using <tab> to read next-undeleted which works fine, but when I set
> > > <shift><tab> to read previous-undeleted it says key not bound. I have it
> > > set for index and pager:
> > > 
> > > bind        index       <tab>           next-undeleted
> > > bind        pager       <tab>           next-undeleted
> > > bind        index       <shift><tab>    previous-undeleted
> > > bind        pager       <shift><tab>    previous-undeleted
> > 
> > I guess you run mutt inside screen. screen emits the same sequence for
> > both tab and shift-tab.  My experience is that it works with xterm but
> > not screen inside xterm.
> 
> Well I do use screen sometimes but I'm not using it at the moment. Perhaps
> the console I'm using (Yakuake) has a bind already - I will check that.
> Thanks for pointing that out.

No this is not a terminal error. Mutt actually gives a message that the key
is unbound.

> 
> > 
> > -- 
> > regards,
> > ====================================================
> > GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
> > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
> > 唐詩187 杜甫  登樓
> >     花近高樓傷客心  萬方多難此登臨  錦江春色來天地  玉壘浮雲變古今
> >     北極朝庭終不改  西山寇盜莫相侵  可憐後主還祠廟  日暮聊為梁父吟
> 
> -- 
> Conscience is a mother-in-law whose visit never ends.
>               -- H. L. Mencken

-- 
The truth of a proposition has nothing to do with its credibility.  And
vice versa.