On Sun 06/15/08 at 09:40 PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [...] that "sent" string in the original pattern will also match folders > named "abSENT" and "SENTimental" and "esSENTial". So it was entirely > possible that the "sent" string was not redundant, and was actually > intentional. Ah. Definitely. What you're talking about is finally sinking in. > >if I want the three folders, "<" "cv" and "dv", all to have > >the same index format, yes? > That's still a bad regular expression for that purpose, because it's > still excessively general. It will match against things like > "advocacy" and "inadvertent" and "advisor". Damn. Of course. > I suggest, at the very least, that you use something more like this: > folder-hook '(<|=cv|=dm)$' 'set index_format="whatever"' Absolutely. Though I'm partial to the plus-sign, so I used that instead of "=". folder-hook '(<|+cv|+dm)$' 'set index_format="whatever"' Thanks for the fine-tuning. -- // rj@xxxxxxxxx //
Attachment:
pgpwxzHL5POvg.pgp
Description: PGP signature