On Sun 06/15/08 at 09:40 PM -0500,
Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [...] that "sent" string in the original pattern will also match folders
> named "abSENT" and "SENTimental" and "esSENTial". So it was entirely
> possible that the "sent" string was not redundant, and was actually
> intentional.
Ah. Definitely. What you're talking about is finally sinking in.
> >if I want the three folders, "<" "cv" and "dv", all to have
> >the same index format, yes?
> That's still a bad regular expression for that purpose, because it's
> still excessively general. It will match against things like
> "advocacy" and "inadvertent" and "advisor".
Damn. Of course.
> I suggest, at the very least, that you use something more like this:
> folder-hook '(<|=cv|=dm)$' 'set index_format="whatever"'
Absolutely. Though I'm partial to the plus-sign, so I used that
instead of "=".
folder-hook '(<|+cv|+dm)$' 'set index_format="whatever"'
Thanks for the fine-tuning.
--
// rj@xxxxxxxxx //
Attachment:
pgpwxzHL5POvg.pgp
Description: PGP signature