<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: OT: offending sig + headers



On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 02:38:15PM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> > > For your current setup, you might consider adding a reply-to header
> > > pointing at the list so that mails don't go to the bogus address by
> > > default for humans. 
> > 
> > You will note that such reply-to already exists, and has for a rather
> > long time...  :)
> 
> Seems to be there in *this* email, but the one I replied to originally
> didn't have it, or mutt ignored it, or something. Anyway... good!

Ah...right.  That's because that message was a reply where the person
I was replying to set a reply-to header that didn't match any of my
hooks, and I missed fixing it manually.  :(  But if you look at the
previous messages in the thread (and all my other recent messages, for
that matter), they all carry it.  :)


-- 
Derek D. Martin    http://www.pizzashack.org/   GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
-=-=-=-=-
This message is posted from an invalid address.  Replying to it will result in
undeliverable mail.  Sorry for the inconvenience.  Thank the spammers.

Attachment: pgpQ7zUMbXBPa.pgp
Description: PGP signature