<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: MUTT file attachments are mandatory?



* Damnshock <damnshock@xxxxxxxxx> [061212 10:00]:
> On Monday 11 December 2006 23:54, Jack Bertram wrote:
> > * fernando.olmos@xxxxxxxxxx <fernando.olmos@xxxxxxxxxx> [061211 22:24]:
> > > Well then. That's what I needed to see! I am not a script expert, so
> > > your solution is amicable. What language? Unix? That's not a language.
> > > Ahhhh C-shell. Thanks!
> >
> > Well, it's Bourne shell. But you're welcome.
> 
> Isn't it Born Again SHell (bash)?

well, bash is Bourne-Again Shell, because sh is the Bourne shell.
Admittedly I wrote bash at the top, but it would run in sh.

j

Attachment: pgp6SjgajjJyV.pgp
Description: PGP signature