Re: MUTT file attachments are mandatory?

To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: MUTT file attachments are mandatory?
From: Jack Bertram <jack@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:54:39 +0000
In-reply-to: <C5B2133CD2641C4EA593D2143A5FA0A851423D@exchange2k>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-users-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
References: <C5B2133CD2641C4EA593D2143A5FA0A851423D@exchange2k>
Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.8i

* fernando.olmos@xxxxxxxxxx <fernando.olmos@xxxxxxxxxx> [061211 22:24]:
> Well then. That's what I needed to see! I am not a script expert, so
> your solution is amicable. What language? Unix? That's not a language.
> Ahhhh C-shell. Thanks!

Well, it's Bourne shell. But you're welcome.

J

Attachment: pgpKlJeXFGBTP.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: MUTT file attachments are mandatory?
  - From: Damnshock

References:
- Re: MUTT file attachments are mandatory?
  - From: fernando . olmos

Prev by Date: Re: get problem
Next by Date: Re: Building MDK 10.1 RPM
Previous by thread: Re: MUTT file attachments are mandatory?
Next by thread: Re: MUTT file attachments are mandatory?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread