<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: Reading mail stored in a DB



On Friday, January 20 at 01:22 PM, quoth markus reichelt:
* Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks for the info, I will backport mutt from Sid for
my older systems (where Sarge/Etch are to heavy).

just wondering... what exactly does "mutt from sid" have to do with
sarge/whatever/older systems? use the source, luke. i don't see any
reason why it would not compile just fine out of the box.

Strictly speaking? Debian’s mutt packagers include several patches. These packages do several things, from make mutt comply with the Debian packaging standards to include updates from CVS. They also include the following patches:

   Debian.Md.etc_mailname_gethostbyname
(the Debian standard requires the use of /etc/mailname for @___ defaults) Debian.Md.use_debian_editor
   (guess)
patch-1.5.11.rr.compressed.1
   (for compressed mbox’s I believe)
patch-1.5.4.vk.pgp_verbose_mime
   (not sure)
patch-1.5.5.1.nt.xtitles.3.ab.1 (makes mutt emit terminal commands to set the xterm title if xterm_set_titles is set to yes) patch-1.5.6.dw.maildir-mtime.1
   (allows maildirs to be sorted by mtime)
patch-1.5.6.tt.assumed_charset.1
   (makes mutt’s charset support first-class)

~Kyle
--
This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or exercise their revolutionary right to overthrow it.
                                                     -- Abraham Lincoln

Attachment: pgpsAwRQMobxR.pgp
Description: PGP signature