Re: why setting 'sig_on_top' is not recommended?
However, this doesn't keep some people from happily using
either that feature -- or emulating it manually when needed.
(And no, it's not always bad e-mail etiquette.)
--
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.
On 2005-12-20 22:40:41 -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
> From: Bo Peng <ben.bob@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Zhiqiang Ye <yezhiqiang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 22:40:41 -0600
> Subject: Re: why setting 'sig_on_top' is not recommended?
> X-Spam-Level:
>
> > In my opinion, when I reply email, the signature information
> > included before any quoted or forwarded message would be more clear.
>
> Check the list archive and you will see that this has been discussed
> several times with *strong* opinions at both sides. The mutt community
> is, in general, against sig_on_top and will teach you lessons about
> emailing etiquette.
>
> So, it is wise not to discuss this issue here and set sig_on_top by yourself.
>
> Cheers,
> Bo
>
>